![]() I did note that after 24 hours and a signature update, Panda wiped out nine samples that had initially slipped past its protection. The best score, 79 percent, goes to avast! Free Antivirus 2014. Panda blocked 15 percent of the URLs, but it only halted the download of another 2 percent of the malicious executables.Īt 17 percent, Panda's blocking rate is the lowest of any product I've tested in this fashion. VIPRE blocked access to 14 percent of the malicious URLs and blocked another 25 percent during the download process. In this case, though, I had the opportunity to test Panda, VIPRE Antivirus 2014, and Outpost Antivirus Pro 9.0 with the exact same collection. The one thing that's constants is that the test URLs are just a few hours old. In general, each antivirus will run up against a different 100 malicious URLs. Malicious URL Blocking My relatively new malicious URL blocking test uses extremely recent malicious URLs supplied in a feed from MRG-Effitas. For a full explanation of the way I derive the star ratings in the chart below, please see How We Interpret Antivirus Lab Tests. Of course, there are others like Bitdefender Antivirus Plus (2014) and Kaspersky Anti-Virus (2014) that ace nearly every test. Without those nasty false positives it would have managed four. Panda also earned 5.5 points for protection, and 4.5 for performance.Īggregating many different tests, I'd summarize Panda's lab test performance as worth three stars, out of a possible five. ![]() Researchers at AV-Test didn't encounter as many false positives they gave Panda 5.5 of 6.0 possible points for usability (a score based on low false positives). In each case, it dropped one full grade due to false positives. Panda would have scored ADVANCED+ in the standard file detection test, ADVANCED in the retrospective detection test, and ADVANCED+ in the real-world dynamic test. In other malware detection tests by AV-Comparatives, it lost points due to false positives-erroneous reporting of valid files as malware. An alternative product found and removed the infections with no problem. Panda entered six of the last twelve tests by Virus Bulletin and received VB100 certification in four of those tests. Reviewed in the United States on J1) Its not very good at protection - my kids and I managed to have several different trojans installed that went undetected while using this product. Panda earned ADVANCED+, the top rating, in a test by AV-Comparatives that focuses specifically on thorough cleanup of known malware. ICSA Labs and West Coast Labs certify Panda both for malware detection and malware cleanup. Its about as simple a malware sample as you could get, but its also something Bitdefender would never have seen before, allowing us to evaluate how Antivirus Plus performs when presented with. The current edition replaces those with a single panel titled "Improve your protection," but as before it links to an upgrade offer.įalse Positives Mar Lab Scores Most of the independent labs I follow include Panda's antivirus technology in their testing, and it gets generally good scores. Clicking one of these would bring up a window extolling the benefits of that feature and offering a link to upgrade. Last year's edition displayed buttons for features present only in Panda's full suite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |